1. insights
  2. strategy catalyst
  3. finance and operations
  4. service line portfolio strategy survey research primer
Insights Briefing | strategy-catalyst

Service Line Portfolio Strategy Survey Research Primer

Hero image for “Service Line Portfolio Strategy in 2026,” featuring Demographics and Governance branding, a clipboard photo, and survey metrics highlighting 40 respondents, 14 service lines assessed, and $5B median NPR.

Research Overview

In early 2026, Strategy Catalyst surveyed 40 CSOs, COOs, EVPs/VPs of Strategy and Operations, and service line executives at U.S. health systems with more than $500M in net patient revenue ($5B median). The survey explored which service lines are sustained as core pillars for strategic or mission-critical reasons, the factors shaping portfolio decisions, and how service line strategy is evolving in practice. The findings are organized around three paradoxes—patterns where what systems say, what they do, and what they have experienced diverge in ways consequential for portfolio strategy.

Preview of the Three Paradoxes

1. The Valuation Paradox: Stated values are balanced; decision drivers are not
  • Leaders say mission, quality, and margin matter equally; financial signals are what drive service line decisions in practice.​

  • Mission-anchored lines are losing ground financially, but no surveyed system has exited one in two years.​

2. The Rationalization Paradox: 90% are rationalizing; few control the key constraint
  • For many systems, rationalization, optimization, and growth are interrelated, as the decision to stop doing something in one place is often intertwined with the decision to grow somewhere else. ​

  • Nearly every system is rationalizing (90%), but the leaders who set the agenda rarely control the constraint most likely to stall execution: physician alignment.

Graphic showing health system service line rationalization strategies and survey insights.

3. The Ambulatory Paradox: Aligned on the destination, late to leave
  • Systems are prioritizing ambulatory expansion for the lines leaders see as most exposed, but site-of-care shifts aren't yet following. Intent is outrunning action. Moreover, being late to the ambulatory transition was the top regret from the past 2-3 years.

Illustration of two speech bubbles above a row of six simplified person icons in blue, green, and orange. The left speech bubble contains a quote from a Chief Operating Officer: "I would have built more ASCs. The shift to ASCs has exploded in the past year and we needed to invest more 2-3 years ago in this space to meet the current capacity." The right speech bubble contains a quote from an Enterprise EVP/SVP of Strategy: "If we could go back, we would put a stronger focus on ambulatory surgery and overall service line outpatient operations." Both quotes reflect executive hindsight on underinvestment in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and outpatient service lines.

Discussion Starters

  • How does your system balance community commitments and mission obligations with financial factors when making service line decisions?​

  • How does your organization approach physician alignment and stakeholder engagement whenpursuing service line changes?​

  • Looking back over the past few years, where do you wish your organization had moved sooneror invested differently?​

  • Where are the biggest opportunities and tradeoffs in your ambulatory and site-of-care strategyover the next few years?​

  • How well-aligned are system, regional, and hospital priorities when it comes to service linestrategy?

Upcoming Events

Strategy Catalyst Webinar: Where the Field Drew the Line: A 2026 Survey on Service Line Strategy

Register here | July 12, 2026 12pm-1pm ET

A readout of original survey findings on how health systems are reshaping their service line portfolios under financial and operational pressure. You will also hear from member co-presenters who will share how they are balancing growth opportunities, competitive pressures, and mission-driven priorities across their service lines. Recommended for: CSOs, CFOs, COOs, Service Line Leaders, and Corporate Strategy and Planning Directors.